Oregon Supreme Court· 2/20/1980

Burke v. Children's Services Division

Citations

607 P.2d 141
288 Or. 533
1980 Ore. LEXIS 742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that declaratory relief need not include injunction, because court assumed responsible state agencies would comply with law as determined by court
holding that agency’s adoption of a daycare payment program without undergoing a formal procedure did not make the rule invalid and that the “agency may not rely on its own procedural failures to avoid the necessity of compliance with its rules”
explaining that, unlike contested-case orders, there is no due process right
administrative rule remains effective statement of existing policy until repealed through proper Oregon APA procedures
“We -will not assume that the defendant agencies of the State of Oregon will, in the absence of an injunction, refuse to follow the law as we have stated it.”
an administrative rule remains an effective statement of existing practice or policy until it is either judicially invalidated or repealed through proper APA procedures, and an agency is obligated to follow it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Lent, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Burke v. Children's Services Division

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.