Burke v. Central Education Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that teacher’s motion for rehearing failed to preserve error because it did not point to any particular finding of fact or conclusion of law, did not identify legal principles referred to, and complained of Board’s action that was unsupported by record
• finding claims in motion for rehearing insufficient to apprise agency of error claimed when, among other things, party failed to indicate the legal basis upon which error claim rested
• affirming summary judgment against party whose motion for rehearing failed to set forth “(1) the particular finding of fact, conclusion of law, ruling, or other action by the agency which the complaining party assert[ed] was error; and (2
• complaint made in motion for rehearing that state board erred by finding school district’s decision was supported by substantial evidence was not sufficiently specific
• in motion for rehearing complaining party must set forth (1) particular action by agency that complaining party alleges was error and (2) legal basis on which claim of error rests
• complaint made in motion for rehearing that state board erred by finding school district’s decision was supported by substantial evidence was not sufficiently specific

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).