Burke v. Bevona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff failed to meet Rule 9(b) pleading standards 20 when she failed to point to the “particular advertisements or promotional materials that 21 she was personally exposed to”
• dismissing claims relating to website and other documents where plaintiff did not allege “that she viewed any of those sources, and therefore cannot link her injuries to those misrepresentations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).