· 10/6/2003
Burke v. Arizona State Retirement System
Citations
- 77 P.3d 444
- 206 Ariz. 269
- 410 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
- 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in a fee-shifting scenario, the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees based on a percentage of the judgment awarded
- noting that the defendant had not conceded \that fees either would be or should be awarded under the common fund doctrine\
- noting that the defendant had not conceded “that fees either would be or should be awarded under the common fund doctrine”
- declining to apply the common fund doctrine because the fee spreading element was not present
- declining to apply the common fund doctrine because the fee spreading element was not present
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Espinosa, Pelander, Druke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.