Skip to main content
· 10/6/2003

Burke v. Arizona State Retirement System

Citations

  • 77 P.3d 444
  • 206 Ariz. 269
  • 410 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
  • 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in a fee-shifting scenario, the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees based on a percentage of the judgment awarded
  • noting that the defendant had not conceded \that fees either would be or should be awarded under the common fund doctrine\
  • noting that the defendant had not conceded “that fees either would be or should be awarded under the common fund doctrine”
  • declining to apply the common fund doctrine because the fee spreading element was not present
  • declining to apply the common fund doctrine because the fee spreading element was not present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa, Pelander, Druke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.