· 12/19/1995
Burgstahler v. AcroMed Corp.
Citations
- 670 A.2d 658
- 448 Pa. Super. 26
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- federal MDAs preempt state common law actions based on inadequate labeling or failure to warn because these are governed by the Act, but other actions are not preempted
- federal MDAs preempt state common law actions based on inadequate labeling or failure to warn because these are governed by the Act, but other actions are not preempted
- ‘At least two federal courts have expressly found that the 510(k) approval under the [Medical Device Amendments of 1979, 21 U.S.C. §§ 360c-360k (Supp. 1995)], - 26 - J-A25038-18 standing alone, is not a finding of safety and effectiveness . . .’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Tamilia, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.