District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/28/2004
Burgos v. State
Citations
- 865 So. 2d 622
- 2004 WL 134013
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was unnecessary to admit evidence that the defendant had battered his girlfriend to provide context for the subsequent charge of battery on a law enforcement officer
- holding that it was unnecessary to admit evidence that the defendant had battered his girlfriend to provide context for the subsequent charge of battery on a law enforcement officer
- domestic battery evidence was not inextricably intertwined because there was a “ ‘clear break’ ” between that incident and defendant’s confrontation with the officers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gersten, Ramirez, and Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dorsett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 51×
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-06-27· cited 19×
- Kates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 11×
- State v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-06-15· cited 9×
- State v. RambaranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-23· cited 7×
- Valdes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-29· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.