Skip to main content

Burgin v. State

Citations

  • 747 So. 2d 916
  • 1999 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 41
  • 1999 WL 171386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s attempt to argue that State witness’s prior inconsistent statement admitted as impeachment evidence was substantive evidence of guilt was cured by trial court’s sustaining of objections and instructing jury that evidence was for impeachment purposes only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.