Burghy v. Dayton Recquet Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[ijneluding the explanatory language alongside the disclosure language is logical,” even considering the statute’s use of the word “solely”
• “[T]he issue the Court must address is whether or not the disclosure was sufficiently conspicuous, not whether it was clear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).