Burget v. Borough of Dormont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the jury found against Murphey in the first action, where he was a counterclaiming defendant for money sought again in this action, his claim was barred by claim preclusion
• concluding that because the jury found against Murphey in the first action, where he was a counterclaiming defendant for money sought again in this action, his claim was barred by claim preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).