Burgess v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On May 8, 2014, this Court stayed expert discovery until the parties’ pending motions were resolved, but the parties continued with fact discovery, which has now been completed.”
• “[I]t is well established that the DJA does not expand the jurisdiction of the federal courts, and a basis for subject matter jurisdiction other than the DJA must be found.”
• “[N]aked licensing will lead to an abandonment of a mark only where the mark loses its significance.” (quoting Patsy’s Italian Rest., Inc. v. Banas, 658 F.3d 254, 265 (2d Cir. 2011))
• “[C]ourts generally have limited famous marks to those that receive multi-million dollar advertising budgets, generate hundreds of millions of dollars in sales annually, and are almost universally recognized by the general public.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).