Burgess v. Reformer Publishing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e cannot subscribe to the theory that a newspaper is entitled to a summary judgment where it prints a nonlibelous article under a libelous headline.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• headline \Grand Jury Probes Embezzlement: Burgess denies getting funds\ failed the fair index test because it conveyed the false impression that Burgess was being investigated by a grand jury when in fact he was only a witness
• “The test is a stringent one.”
• \The test is a stringent one.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).