Burgess v. Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “general rule, that he who holds the affirmative must prove it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. LOVELL REGENCY HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-20· cited 28×
• Board of Trustees, Community College of Baltimore County v. Patient First Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-18· cited 25×
• Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. Wilkinson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1869-03-09· cited 19×
• Daniels v. Superintendent, Clifton T. Perkins State Hospital
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-08· cited 16×
• Harris v. J. Regester & Sons
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1889-01-10· cited 9×
• Brown v. Murdock
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1861-01-23· cited 5×
• Berry v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-05· cited 4×
• Eakle v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1867-07-17· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Karthaus v. Owings
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1830-06-15· cited 15×
• Wilson v. Ireland
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1853-12-15· cited 13×
• Atwell v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1854-12-15· cited 13×
• Young v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1835-12-15· cited 10×
• Lloyd v. Burgess
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1846-12-15· cited 6×
• Warfield v. Walter
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1839-12-15· cited 5×
• Ringgold v. Hinson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1666-10-15· cited 3×
• Frantz v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1847-12-15· cited 2×