Burgess v. Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that an appeal “should not count as a third strike because, he argues, he should be assessed no more than one strike per action”
• granting defendants’ motion to dismiss because plaintiff “simply allege[d] that he has been assaulted in the past, and there [were] no allegations in the complaint indicating that another attack is imminent”
• “To fall within the exception, however, the danger must be specific in nature, and amount to more than just fear that a physical attack could occur at some point in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).