Burgess v. Chicago Sun-Times

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff could not show causation because he did not allege that “defendant was informed, or in any way found out, that he was pursuing any remedy under the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
• “[T]here exists no requirement in Illinois that in order to state a viable cause of action for retaliatory discharge, a plaintiff must plead that he was discharged in retaliation for filing a Workers' Compensation claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).