Skip to main content
· 7/2/1883

Burges v. Pollitzer

Citations

  • 19 S.C. 451
  • 1883 S.C. LEXIS 96

Syllabus

<p>Complaint for goods sold and delivered was verified and its allegations were-admitted by tlie answer, wMcli set up a counter-claim. Plaintiff then filed with the clerk of court, an admission of the counter-claim, and on the call of the default docket at the next term, moved for judgment for the excess. Held, that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for such excess in like manner as in cases of default, and that notice to defendant of application for judgment was not necessary.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.