Skip to main content
· 1/5/1990

Burger King v. Pilgrim's Pride

Citations

  • 894 F.2d 412
  • 1990 WL 3686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence sufficient to show likelihood of confusion even though trademark owner sold hot and ready-to-eat food, and alleged 19 infringer sold frozen food

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.