Skip to main content
· 1/28/1991

Burger King Corp. v. Thomas

Citations

  • 755 F. Supp. 1026
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1532
  • 1991 WL 12719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • weighing this factor in favor of retention of the case when transfer would “merely shift inconvenience from defendant to plaintiff” (citation omitted)
  • “[A] cause of action for trademark infringement arises where the infringing activities take place.” (alteration added; citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aronovitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.