Burge v. Krug

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The whole object of the statute would be frustrated if any substantive portion of the agreement’ could be established by parol evidence.”
• \The whole object of the statute would be frustrated if any substantive portion of the agreement could be established by parol evidence.\
• \The whole object of the statute 04-1151 8 would be frustrated if any substantive portion of the agreement could be established by parol evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sterling v. Taylor
  California Supreme Court· 2007-03-01· cited 57×
• Shaban v. Shaban
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-04-11· cited 32×
• Irving H. Levin and Harold A. Lipton v. Philip H. Knight
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-01-13· cited 19×
• Calvi v. Bittner
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-12-21· cited 8×
• Erving Paper Mills v. Hudson-Sharp Machine Co.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1963-09-26· cited 3×
• Lamle v. Mattel
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-07