Skip to main content
· 9/27/1994

Burge v. Fidelity Bond and Mortg. Co.

Citations

  • 648 A.2d 414
  • 1994 Del. LEXIS 301
  • 1994 WL 531393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Superior Court did not exceed its discretion in finding a foreclosing mortgagee’s unilateral mistakes were an irregularity and setting aside a Sheriff’s sale
  • explaining that a unilateral mistake must have “occurred regardless of the exercise of ordinary care”
  • noting exception to the general rule on fees and costs when the circumstances of an individual case mandate that the court, in its discretion, assess counsel fees
  • “In the law of contracts, a party is permitted to rescind an agreement based upon its unilateral mistake when: (1) enforcement of the agreement would be unconscionable; (2) the mistake relates to the substance of the consideration; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Holland, Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.