· 9/27/1994
Burge v. Fidelity Bond and Mortg. Co.
Citations
- 648 A.2d 414
- 1994 Del. LEXIS 301
- 1994 WL 531393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Superior Court did not exceed its discretion in finding a foreclosing mortgagee’s unilateral mistakes were an irregularity and setting aside a Sheriff’s sale
- explaining that a unilateral mistake must have “occurred regardless of the exercise of ordinary care”
- noting exception to the general rule on fees and costs when the circumstances of an individual case mandate that the court, in its discretion, assess counsel fees
- “In the law of contracts, a party is permitted to rescind an agreement based upon its unilateral mistake when: (1) enforcement of the agreement would be unconscionable; (2) the mistake relates to the substance of the consideration; (3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh, Holland, Hartnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.