Burg v. Dampier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that by virtue of the grant of a perpetual, non-exclusive roadway easement, the plaintiffs \had the express right to utilize the easement for ingress and egress ... and had the further right (if not the obligation) to mow and otherwise maintain the easement\
• “Arguments advanced in the brief but not raised in the point relied on are not preserved[.]”
• the express terms of an easement are to be enforced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).