Burdo v. Burdo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of parties' uncommunicated subjective understanding of ambiguous language in contract is irrelevant
• the court finds that an ambiguity exists in the contract, but ignores the parties’ “own interpretations of the stipulation, which we view as nothing more than expressions of uncommunicated subjective intent” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).