Skip to main content
· 1/19/2011

Burdine v. Stryker Corp.

Citations

  • 766 F. Supp. 2d 837
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7832
  • 2011 WL 198013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a parallel statute with the same exception for drugs and medical devices is an affirmative defense that “[t]he defendant has the burden of pleading and proving . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James G. Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.