Skip to main content
· 5/25/1989

Burdick v. Tucker

Citations

  • 780 P.2d 34
  • 13 Brief Times Rptr. 609
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1040
  • 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 137
  • 1989 WL 55604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when secured party does not comply with notice provisions, a rebuttable presumption that sale price was equal to amount of outstanding debt; to rebut presumption, debtor must establish fair market value through evidence other than sale price
  • when secured party does not comply with notice provisions, a rebuttable presumption that sale price was equal to amount of outstanding debt; to rebut presumption, debtor must establish fair market value through evidence other than sale price

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plank, Jones, Ney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.