Skip to main content
· 7/1/1859

Burdge v. Smith

Citations

  • 14 Cal. 380

Syllabus

<p>Neither the Act of 1858 as to the location of seminary land, nor the Act of Congress donating it, allows mineral land to be located.</p> <p>The presumption under our statute is, that all land in the State is public land, until the legal title is shown to have passed from the government to private parties.</p> <p>This presumption is reconcilable with the presumption of title arising from possession.</p> <p>The possession of agricultural land is prima faeie proof of title against a trespasser; but where it is shown, that the party goes on mineral land to mine, there is no presumption that he is a trespasser; and the statutory presumption, that it is public land, in the absence of proof of title in the person claiming it as agricultural land, applies.</p> <p>How far the right of miners to go upon public mineral land, in possession of another, for the purpose of mining, must be modified to secure any rights of such possessor, reserved.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no evidence of fraud or undue influence where the only evidence established that donor and beneficiary often spent time together, and beneficiary was considerably younger than donor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.