Skip to main content
· 1/29/1957

Burchfield v. Horne

Citations

  • 38 Ala. App. 673
  • 92 So. 2d 433
  • 1957 Ala. App. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a “but for” theory for expenses relating to probate matters, as it would be too broad
  • rejecting a compensation theory under which all “‘but for’ expenses would have to be compensable including a wide variety of probate matters”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.