Burch v. Millas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the petitioner could not show his favorable polygraph test results were reliable new evidence for purposes of demonstrating actual innocence
• where the petitioner challenged the underlying felony conviction that led to his detention, the presumption of collateral consequences existed, notwithstanding the petitioner’s completion of his sentence (citing Spencer, 523 U.S. at 7-8)
• where the petitioner challenged the underlying felony conviction that led to his detention, the presumption of collateral consequences existed, notwithstanding the petitioner’s completion of his sentence (citing Spencer, 523 U.S. at 7-8)
• where the petitioner challenged the underlying felony conviction that led to his detention, the presumption of collateral consequences existed, notwithstanding the petitioner’s completion of his sentence (citing Spencer, 523 U.S. at 7-8)
• where the petitioner challenged the underlying felony conviction that led to his detention, the presumption of collateral consequences existed, notwithstanding the petitioner’s completion of his sentence (citing Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7-8 (2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).