Burch v. Louisville Car Wheel & Railway Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where ALJ failed to comply with Appeals Council’s directive to seek additional treating records and clarification regarding provider’s assessment of plaintiff’s impairments
• finding, where ALJ’s decision lacked specificity and failed to meet Agency requirements for evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints, remand was required
• finding improper analysis of factors in § 404.1529(c)(3)(i)-(vii) a “serious flaw in [ALJ’s] credibility determination”
• remanding for ALJ’s failure to comply with AC’s directive to obtain treatment records from particular provider and amplify analysis of provider’s opinions
• remanding where the ALJ “failed to consider the uniquely subjective nature of the [p]laintiff's fibromyalgia condition and selectively cited from the record in discrediting her complaints.”
• finding the ALJ “selectively cited from the record in discrediting [a plaintiff’s] complaints” and mischaracterized the activities of “preparing simple meals, doing laundry, washing dishes, cleaning and shopping” as in conflict with fibromyalgia symptoms.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).