Skip to main content
· 10/26/1895

Burbridge v. Kilgannon

Citations

  • 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s actions, without more, did not violate N.C.G.S. § 15A–1343(b)(3a
  • holding that defendant’s actions, without more, did not violate N.C.G.S. § 15A–1343(b)(3a
  • holding that defendant’s actions, without more, did not violate N.C.G.S. § 15A–1343(b)(3a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conlaít

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.