· 4/26/1983
Buran Equipment Co. v. H & C INVESTMENT CO.
Citations
- 142 Cal. App. 3d 338
- 190 Cal. Rptr. 878
- 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1694
- 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[S]ale may occur before repossession of the collateral. In modem day commercial transactions, often involving large equipment as the security, it would not be unusual for the equipment to be located in diverse geographical locations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.