Buntin v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that heavy reliance on whether a state-law opt- in requirement is located within the text of the statute “appears misplaced” as the concurrence made only a “passing mention of the New York statute’s location in the state code”
• “The UCSPA establishes substantive consumer rights and corresponding remedies, but a potential UCSPA class member’s entitlement to those rights do not change based on whether the process for joining a suit entails opt-in or opt-out notice of the proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).