Buntin v. City of Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding stigma-plus claim failed where there was “no allegation [of publication] beyond the [unemployment] hearings”
• observing that this court may affirm \on any basis made evident by the record\
• noting that Section 1981 “had no such exhaustion requirement” like Title VII
• collecting cases holding that Section 1981 does not have an administrative exhaustion requirement
• applying four-year statute of limitations to retaliation claim under § 1981
• “the government must have failed to comply with the employee’s request for a name-clearing hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).