Bunnell v. Iverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “once the gift which is clear and definite in its terms is completed following acceptance and assumption of dominion by the donee it is not subject to revocation”
• gift is complete when there is (1) a clear and unmistakable intention to make the gift, and (2) the consummation of such intention by those acts which the law requires to divest the donor and invest the donee with the right of property
• gift is complete when there is (1) a clear and unmistakable intention to make the gift, and (2) the consummation of such intention by those acts which the law requires to divest the donor and invest the donee with the right of property
• gift is complete when there is (1) a clear and unmistakable intention to make the gift, and (2) the consummation of such intention by those acts which the law requires to divest the donor and invest the donee with the right of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).