Bunn v. Lindsay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that damages for loss of enjoyment of life are a component of permanent impairment
• upholding $25,000 verdict for wife where defendant’s negligence rendered husband less “physically active”
• discussing the plaintiff’s permanent impairment in negligence case and noting that the plaintiff’s physician testified as to a 12% permanent impairment while the defendant’s expert testified as to a 9% permanent impairment
• upholding $25,000 verdict for wife where defendant’s negligence rendered husband less “physically active”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).