Skip to main content
· 2/10/2000

Bunn-O-Matic Corp. v. Bunn Coffee Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 88 F. Supp. 2d 914
  • 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1012
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1299
  • 2000 WL 149307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an agreement conveyed a trademark license despite the agreement's lack of an explicit quality control provision
  • stating that grant of permission to use grantor’s trademark, retention of ownership, and grantor’s obligating itself to maintain quality standards are “the essential terms of a trademark license”
  • “Bunn-NY lost any independent claim of right to the name when it signed the license.”
  • “The likelihood of confusion exists as a matter of law if a licensee continues to use marks owned by the licensor after termination of the license.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.