· 2/10/2000
Bunn-O-Matic Corp. v. Bunn Coffee Service, Inc.
Citations
- 88 F. Supp. 2d 914
- 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1012
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1299
- 2000 WL 149307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an agreement conveyed a trademark license despite the agreement's lack of an explicit quality control provision
- stating that grant of permission to use grantor’s trademark, retention of ownership, and grantor’s obligating itself to maintain quality standards are “the essential terms of a trademark license”
- “Bunn-NY lost any independent claim of right to the name when it signed the license.”
- “The likelihood of confusion exists as a matter of law if a licensee continues to use marks owned by the licensor after termination of the license.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.