Bunge N. Am. Grain Corp. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an error under Blakely, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, was structural and could never be harmless
• holding that an error under Blakely, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, was structural and could never be harmless
• holding that to create a means for the jury, on remand, to decide aggravating sentencing factors \out of whole cloth would be to usurp the power of the legislature\
• holding that a procedure to impanel juries to find aggravating factors would usurp the power of the legislature
• stating that, when “determining] the amount of restitution, the trial court can either rely on a defendant’s acknowledgment or it can determine the amount by a preponderance of evidence”
• observing Blakely’s exception that permits judges to find existence of prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).