Skip to main content
· 1/29/1998

Bundy American Corp. v. Blankfort (In Re Blankfort)

Citations

  • 217 B.R. 138
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 118
  • 1998 WL 54779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • violating four separate district court orders to desist established malice in breach of contract case
  • finding aggravating circumstances where defendant persistently, blatantly, and willfully violated court orders enjoining the underlying conduct
  • plaintiff stated a claim under section 523(a)(6) where defendant engaged in “socially reprehensible conduct” in repeatedly violating an injunction and other district court orders.
  • while a breach of a franchise contract and copyright and trademark infringement would not give rise to non-dischargeability under § 523(a)(6
  • proof of actual, malevolent intent to inflict injury, or “Biblical malice”, is not required, but a showing of aggravating circumstances evidencing willful conduct so reprehensible as to warrant exception to the “fresh start” policy is required
  • “Behavior that the court cannot justify on any level will lead to non- dischargeability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.