Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• household exclusion in umbrella policy was enforceable because it -8- required the policyholder to maintain primary liability coverage in amounts that satisfied the no-fault act
• “[T]he statutory minimum insurance limits . . . satisfy the express public policy goal of the no-fault act of ensuring that automobile accident victims will not go ‘uncompensated.’”
• “The extent of an insurer’s obligations to its insured is governed by the language of the contract to which the parties agreed so long as the policy does not omit legally required coverage or contravene applicable statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).