Skip to main content

Bunch v. State

Citations

  • 937 N.E.2d 839
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2116
  • 2010 WL 4634785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that three counts of criminal confinement violated double jeopardy where victim was moved at gunpoint throughout home during burglary
  • concluding that there was no double jeopardy when enhancing the defendant’s convictions for robbery and confinement where a sawed-off shotgun was used
  • holding that the use of the sawed-off shotgun to enhance the defendant’s robbery and confinement convictions did not constitute double jeopardy
  • explaining that establishment of a lack of consent can be inferred from the evidence
  • affirming convictions for both burglary and robbery \[b]ecause the burglary was complete before the robbery began\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Riley, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.