Skip to main content
· 9/18/1867

Bunce v. Gallagher

Citations

  • 4 F. Cas. 660
  • 5 Blatchf. 481
  • 1867 U.S. App. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing issue whether confinement on bread and water violated Article 55 or the Eighth Amendment
  • addressing issue whether confinement on bread and water violated Article 55 or the Eighth Amendment
  • affirming the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review’s disapproval of three days confinement on bread and water though Valead had already served those three days
  • affirming the Navy Marine Corps Court of Military Review’s disapproval of three days confinement on bread and water though Valead had already served those three days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shipman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.