· 9/18/1867
Bunce v. Gallagher
Citations
- 4 F. Cas. 660
- 5 Blatchf. 481
- 1867 U.S. App. LEXIS 695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing issue whether confinement on bread and water violated Article 55 or the Eighth Amendment
- addressing issue whether confinement on bread and water violated Article 55 or the Eighth Amendment
- affirming the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review’s disapproval of three days confinement on bread and water though Valead had already served those three days
- affirming the Navy Marine Corps Court of Military Review’s disapproval of three days confinement on bread and water though Valead had already served those three days
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shipman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.