Bully v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fourth Amendment “does not preclude the use of force in some circumstances to extract a blood sample from a resistant suspect”
• holding that the Fourth Amendment “does not preclude the use of force in some circumstances to extract a blood sample from a resistant suspect”
• applying in part Graham balancing test in plurality opinion involving drunk-driving suspect’s forced blood sample
• applying in part Graham balancing test in plurality opinion involving drunk-driving suspect's forced blood sample
• unreasonable to forcibly extract blood against the will of arrestee who indicates a willingness to undergo alternative form of alcohol testing
• unreasonable to forcibly extract blood against the will of arrestee who indicates a willingness to undergo alternative form of alcohol testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).