Supreme Court· 11/17/1980
Bullwinkle v. California
Citations
- 449 U.S. 988
- 66 L. Ed. 2d 285
- 101 S. Ct. 522
- 49 U.S.L.W. 3371
- 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer’s subjective belief irrelevant to question of validity of search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BiegenwaldSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 269×
- Donald Wayne Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1986-07-28· cited 69×
- Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1991-11-29· cited 41×
- Thomas v. Kemp, WardenSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 39×
- Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now v. Municipality Of GoldenTenth Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 33×
- State v. ChristiansonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-08-17· cited 20×
- Dunham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-01-29· cited 12×
- Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Municipality of Golden, ColoradoTenth Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 10×
- People v. RugglesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-11-10· cited 2×
- Hardy v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1982-01-25
Other cases named Bullwinkle v. California
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.