Bullock v. Pace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that the same requirement of non-offense related evidence of dangerousness [in certification cases] applies to motions for EJJ designation.”
• \We conclude that the same requirement of non-offense related evidence of dangerousness [in certification cases] applies to motions for EJJ designation.\
• applying Dahl non-offense-related evidence of dangerousness requirement to EJJ case
• applying Dahl non-offense-related evidence of dangerousness requirement to EJJ case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).