Bullock v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• foundational requirements for admission of canine scent tracking evidence not satisfied where testimony revealed that scene of crime had not been guarded prior to arrival of bloodhounds and undetermined number of persons transgressed the area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Terrell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-12· cited 44×
• Bullock v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-05-02· cited 35×
• Debruler v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2007-08-23· cited 13×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pedigo v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1898-01-22· cited 64×
• Blair v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-10-04· cited 41×
• Meyers v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-04-21· cited 28×
• Blair v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1918-06-21· cited 27×
• Sprouse v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1909-02-26· cited 23×
• Pace v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-06-02· cited 22×
• Slaughter v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-06-11· cited 19×