Bullene v. Coates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is unnecessary to utilize” the rule of reason where the deed language “clearly expresses the parties’ intent”
• “The beginning and end of 15 our inquiry is found in the words of the easement deeds. Our task is to determine the parties’ intent in light of the surrounding circumstances at the time the easements were granted.”
• clear and unambiguous language in a deed is controlling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).