Bulldog Battery Corp. v. Pica Investments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant should have been permitted to name a nonparty who may have “caused or contributed to the cause of the plaintiff’s injury[,]” even though nonparty could not be held liable to plaintiff for any damages due to a lack of privity of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).