Bullard v. Garvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that if A.R.S. § 44-2001 were to be construed to “permit a purchaser of securities sold in violation of the Act to sell the securities and still sue for damages . . . [it would] negate the supposed purpose of the legislature in requiring a strict tender”
• “While there are penal provisions in ... [§ 44-2001], it seems clear that the ... statute ... is one providing for a civil remedy, and the court sees no need to apply rules of construction pertaining to penal statutes____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).