Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/14/1983
Bull v. Fenich
Citations
- 661 P.2d 1012
- 34 Wash. App. 435
- 1983 Wash. App. LEXIS 2327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that probate court’s order was a final judgment because it represented the final adjudication of the parties’ rights
- holding that probate court’s order was a final judgment because it represented the final adjudication of the parties’ rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roe, Munson, McInturff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-07· cited 47×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-07· cited 47×
- In Re the Marriage of MaddixCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-07-23· cited 37×
- In Re Douglas E. Miller, Debtor. Bonnie G. Snavely v. Douglas E. Miller, Debtor-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2005-02-02· cited 28×
- Franklin v. KlundtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-17· cited 19×
- Chau v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-01-07· cited 12×
- Pollard v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court· 1987-08-20· cited 10×
- Fortner v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-23· cited 3×
- Heritage Baptist Church v. Central Puget Sound Growth ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-12· cited 3×
- Miller v. SnavelyNinth Circuit· 2005-02-01
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-30· cited 112×
- Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-06-08· cited 86×
- Matter of Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 38×
- Beagles v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-25· cited 38×
- Lavergne v. BoysenWashington Supreme Court· 1973-08-23· cited 18×
- Juel v. DollWashington Supreme Court· 1957-12-19· cited 9×
- Knisely v. Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-27· cited 6×
- In Re the Estate of MooreWashington Supreme Court· 1950-07-31· cited 6×
- Rogers v. OlanderWashington Supreme Court· 1955-08-18· cited 4×
- In Re the Adoption of HamiltonWashington Supreme Court· 1952-08-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.