Bull Motors, LLC v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing order granting mandatory injunction, in part, because the pleadings did not request the mandatory 3 injunction entered by the trial court
• reversing and remanding a court order granting a permanent injunction in part because “the injunction mandating [Defendant’s] future behavior and specifying the precise language the company must use with all future customers [was] overly broad”
• \Procedural due process requires that each litigant be given proper notice and a full and fair opportunity to be heard.\ Carmona v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP , 81 So. 3d 461 , 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
• \Procedural due process requires that each litigant be given proper notice and a full and fair opportunity to be heard.\ Carmona v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP , 81 So. 3d 461 , 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).