Skip to main content
· 3/17/1992

Bull & Bear Group, Inc. v. Fuller

Citations

  • 786 F. Supp. 388
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3313
  • 1992 WL 52649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that abstention was appropriate because “allowing [the] case to proceed in federal court would pose a risk of inconsistent and contradictory results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.