Buletini v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant abused its discretion by failing to address evidence of plaintiff’s original scientific and scholarly work, including a book authored by plaintiff and opinion letters from experts in the medical field
• concluding that defendant abused its discretion, in part, where it failed to mention or address 6 That the Decision Letter strongly suggests that the opinion letters do not “reach[] . . . beyond [Rubin’s] employer(s
• finding denial was arbitrary and capricious where Albanian physician won a national award, published a medi- cal dictionary and numerous articles, was responsible for gen- eral health projects, and served as an adjunct professor
• finding denial was arbitrary and capricious where Albanian physician won a national award, published a medi- cal dictionary and numerous articles, was responsible for gen- eral health projects, and served as an adjunct professor
• “[P]laintiff submitted a letter of reference * * * stating, inter alia, that plaintiff’s dictionary is an original work that will provide invaluable assistance to all persons who write or translate from the German language[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).